|
|
|

Public Participation Policy and Implementation Guidelines |
|
12/12/00
|
I. Introduction |
A. |
Purpose
The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (DES) promotes
the active and comprehensive participation from the public as an essential
component in the Department’s decision-making. This policy is intended
to ensure that public participation is an integral and effective part of
Departmental activities, providing a mechanism for bringing a broad range
of diverse stakeholder viewpoints and values into the Department’s decision-making
processes. This early and on-going public involvement enables the Department
to make more informed decisions, improve work quality through collaborative
efforts, and build mutual understanding and trust between the Department
and the public it serves. |
B. |
Scope
This policy is designed to function as a general framework within which
all Department programs operate. The policy is not intended to limit any
legal requirements imposed by law, regulation, or contractual agreement;
nor does it modify any legal rights available to the public under current
law or rules. Certain DES programs have additional specific public participation
requirements (e.g., hearing notification lead times); these specific
requirements shall be adhered to along with the general public participation
processes described herein. In the event of any direct conflict between
general policies and specific requirements, the specific requirements will
prevail. This policy is not intended to apply to case-specific enforcement-related
decisions. Public input regarding enforcement decisions has been and will
continue to be sought in the context of DES’s Compliance Assurance Response
Policy (CARP).
|
II. Goals
DES’s public participation goals are as follows: |
A. |
DES will actively solicit public input and will consider the views
of the agency’s stakeholders and the general public in making decisions. |
B. |
DES will strive to ensure fair and equitable treatment
of all New Hampshire citizens as it invites public participation in the
implementation of state environmental statutes, rules, programs, and policies. |
C. |
In order to provide the opportunity for meaningful input, stakeholders
will be brought into the process as early as possible. |
D. |
DES will, to the extent possible, provide data and analysis in a timely
manner and in an understandable format to enhance the ability of stakeholders
to participate constructively in the issue or issues under consideration. |
E. |
DES will respond in a complete and timely manner to requests under
the N.H. Right to Know Law (RSA 91-A). |
F. |
This policy will be consistently incorporated into the Department’s
programs, and DES will strive to ensure that every DES employee understands
and shares responsibility for the implementation of this policy.
|
III. Basic Principles
DES’s public participation goals, set forth above, are based upon the
following principles: |
A. |
Public participation helps to identify important issues. Decision-making
benefits from a diversity of opinion and expertise. When afforded the opportunity,
interested citizens with varied backgrounds and experiences can contribute
useful information, historical data, and new perspectives to the decision-making
process. The public may help identify issues and alternatives that might
not arise through other means. |
B. |
Public participation fosters greater public confidence in DES’s
programs. A good public participation program enables those who are
interested in or affected by a proposal to have an opportunity to influence
the decision-making process. Presenting information openly, evaluating
issues and alternatives fairly, and following through on commitments builds
credibility for the eventual outcomes. |
C. |
Public participation helps advance DES’s environmental equity policy.
Timely opportunity for informed public participation is a key part
of meeting the intent and purpose of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act [1964],
Presidential Executive Order 12898 of 1994 and the Department’s Environmental
Equity Policy of September, 1994. |
D. |
Public participation enhances mutual understanding. Public participation
activities promote communication and improve understanding among involved
parties. DES can better understand the effects of proposed actions on the
public and the environment by hearing from those potentially affected.
By responding to comments and questions, DES can help the public understand
the technical aspects of a particular proposal, as well as the broader
policy, political, and legal framework within which DES must make its decisions. |
E. |
Public participation results in better decisions. Public participation
helps DES make informed decisions that take into account the public’s views
on, for example, legal, technical, environmental, economic, and social
issues. When a decision acknowledges disparate views and provides reasons
why other views were not accepted, it is more likely to be implemented
more successfully. |
F. |
Public participation generally enhances community support and minimizes
delays. Effective public participation will not eliminate all conflicts
and controversies. However, providing the public with a voice in the process
will likely help reduce concerns about a proposal. Public workshops, meetings,
hearings, and other communications provide information and, in the process,
help dispel rumors, fears, and misunderstanding. |
G. |
Public participation builds trust. Public participation activities
succeed when conducted in a spirit of openness and forthrightness and with
a genuine opportunity for a diversity of information. On-going two-way
communication, conducted in an atmosphere of courtesy and civility, is
crucial for the exchange of ideas that enhance trust between the public
and DES. |
H. |
Public participation is most successful early in clearly-defined
planning and decision-making processes. It is important that DES personnel,
other government officials, stakeholders, and the general public be integrated
into the planning activities and decision-making processes at an early
stage. |
I. |
Public participation can be enhanced by creating stakeholder advisory
groups. DES recognizes that soliciting advice from stakeholders with
knowledge and expertise in particular fields can be beneficial to developing
viable state programs and regulations. Stakeholder involvement can occur
through such entities as special work groups, task forces, or other advisory
bodies. This is particularly valuable in helping DES to address significant
public policy issues, environmental initiatives, and regulatory requirements. |
J. |
Public participation involves a variety of communication tools.
It is necessary to use a full range of tools to engage the public.
|
|
Appendix A
Policy Implementation Guidelines
The following recommendations are provided as guidelines for implementing
the DES Public Participation Policy. They should be used whenever feasible
to help carry out the agency’s public participation goals.
I. General Recommendations
-
Begin planning and budgeting for public participation activities at the
earliest stages of project or program planning. Use the checklist set forth
in Appendix B to help design a public participation process for each specific
project.
-
Consult and coordinate with DES outreach staff, including those in each
Division and those in the Public Information and Permitting Office. They
will be able to help plan and conduct all levels of public participation
activities. Through public affairs officers, seek to obtain a good understanding
of local issues, values, and interested and affected persons to help anticipate
how the public would like to participate in the process.
-
Carry out public participation activities in a manner supportive of the
Department’s environmental equity policy. This environmental equity policy
can be found at www.des.state.nh.us/equity_policy.htm.
-
Carry out public participation activities in a manner supportive of the
Americans with Disabilities Act, providing equal opportunity for all people
with disabilities to access DES information, including DES meetings and
DES’s web page.
-
Establish working relationships with key audiences such as state and local
governments, environmental organizations, the business community, and civic
groups. This may be done through the creation of special advisory task
forces, for example.
-
Actively seek interactions with the public through speaking engagements,
civic groups, exhibits, workshops, etc. Obtain information from the public
on a specific issue via polls, questionnaires, interviews, forums, meetings,
seminars, community site visits, focus groups, and Internet exchanges.
-
Present alternatives fairly and objectively. Do not overstate benefits
or minimize costs and potential impacts. Recognize that members of the
public may identify additional reasonable alternatives to the proposed
action.
-
Practice active and empathetic listening to understand other points of
view.
-
Encourage the public to provide specific comments rather than simply to
express satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the proposed action.
-
Develop and maintain a list of relevant contacts.
-
In addition to the general public participation procedures set forth herein,
adhere to any specific procedures (e.g., notifications, deadlines,
etc.) set forth in the statutes and/or rules.
-
At the conclusion of a particular process or initiative, consider seeking
suggestions for improvement in the process from the public.
-
Involve the public early in the decision-making process, before narrowing
alternatives and making other key decisions.
-
Inform state and local governments, civic and environmental organizations,
and communications media of the proposed action and the public participation
process to be conducted.
II. Recommendations Regarding Public Meetings and Workshops
-
Conduct public meetings and hearings in a manner that encourages discussion
and mutual understanding of the proposed action. Whenever possible, meetings
and workshops should have interactive components to encourage dialogue
between DES and the public. Opportunity to submit written comments should
also be provided; allow a sufficient time period to review all written
comments following the meetings.
-
Provide sufficient lead time for all public meetings and workshops, and
provide notice in newspapers, newsletters, the Internet, and other appropriate
means.
-
Some of the best results of meetings stem from providing an opportunity
for all the parties to meet one another and listen to the concerns of others.
Face-to-face meetings are more likely to encourage fruitful discussion
than simply providing written responses.
-
Substantial environmental controversy concerning a proposed action may
indicate a need for public meetings.
-
When time allows, consider holding pre-meeting briefings to provide state
and local government officials, DES employees, and the local media with
specific information on the proposed action and the schedule of upcoming
activities.
-
A skilled, well-informed facilitator can substantially enhance public input
at informal meetings. Such a facilitator need not be a DES employee.
-
A single large public meeting brings together all the interested parties
and is an important tool in involving the public. However, large meetings
can grow unwieldy, limiting the opportunity for discussion, making dialogue
difficult, and frustrating participants. Sometimes informal meetings in
small groups are better for eliciting useful information and encouraging
interaction with individuals who may not be comfortable speaking before
a large audience. Concurrent topical breakout sessions where people can
go from room to room are sometimes valuable. Sessions can then be repeated
at other times or on other days. (Remember to include any appropriate comment
made in breakout sessions in the official record of the meeting.)
-
Give the logistical and presentation details careful consideration when
planning a public meeting. Consider the needs of all people, including
those with disabilities, by addressing such things as room layout, comfort
and safety, accessibility, room temperature, and extraneous noise.
-
Seek to understand the public’s expectations and needs. Work with local
organizations and community groups to help plan meeting formats and locations
that will meet their needs and DES’s needs. Consider meeting in community
centers, schools, libraries, etc. for the public’s convenience.
-
Strive to hold at least some meeting sessions during evening hours.
-
In addition to DES employees, consider asking representatives of stakeholders,
permit appli-cants, other agency officials, etc. to make a short
presentation and to respond to questions. Such officials should also be
encouraged to be available in breakout rooms for dialogue with interested
people.
-
DES representatives should never argue with meeting participants or disparage
any views presented, although it is appropriate to indicate polite disagreement
and to clarify misunderstandings of facts.
-
A record of all public meetings should be kept and a summary report produced
on a timely basis, including any recommendations (often required by law
— see RSA 91-A and RSA 541-A).
-
When possible and appropriate, staff should summarize meeting minutes or
flip-chart notes, respond to comments received, and write thank you notes
as appropriate. A personal touch with correspondence can help to build
trust and working relationships.
III. Recommendations Regarding Public Hearings
-
In addition to publication of a notice in a paper of general circulation,
DES should seek to identify interested parties and notify them specifically.
-
Hearing notices affecting a significant number of minority and non-English
speaking persons should be translated and advertised in media which customarily
serve such persons.
-
Hearing notices should include mention that translation services, including
signing for the hearing impaired, can be provided if a request for such
service is made before a specified date.
-
The venue of hearings should be carefully selected such that the venue
be wheelchair accessible.
IV. Recommendations for Making Information Available
A. General
-
Disclose information. Unless restricted as privileged or confidential (e.g.,
trade secret/ confidential business information, attorney-client privilege,
deliberative process privilege), DES should make information about a proposal
readily available to the public.
-
Make information available well in advance of public meetings.
-
Establish information repositories to make all information pertaining to
the proposed action readily available to interested persons. Such repositories
could be in public libraries or other locations that are open during evening
or weekend hours, including the Internet.
-
In addition to publishing notices of events or availability of documents
in the N.H. Rulemaking Register and in the legal notice sections of newspapers,
use media that members of the public are more likely to encounter, such
as community and school newspapers, daily newspapers, radio and television
announcements, and notices in public places. The goal is to notify the
interested or affected public. The notice can be placed in advertising
space to guarantee publication and increase the likelihood that the public
will see it. Issuing press releases to the news media may not be enough,
because these media often only carry stories that they consider "newsworthy."
-
When appropriate, print public notices in Spanish, French, or other foreign
languages.
-
Make an effort to enhance the media’s understanding of the issues related
to the program, site, or proposed action. This will facilitate the dissemination
of accurate information to the public.
-
Prepare and distribute follow-up reports to assist the public in evaluating
decisions.
B. Electronic Communication
Use computer bulletin boards, e-mail, Internet, and similar forms of
communication to provide members of the public with easy, inexpensive access
to information about DES activities, including meetings and availability
of documents. Use the DES web site as much as effectively possible. (Contact
the PIP Unit for coordinating the placement of information on DES’s home
page.)
C. Mailing Lists
-
Use DES’s latest stakeholder mailing lists and the Public Information and
Permitting Unit’s mailing lists to help identify potentially interested
or affected groups and government agencies. Remember that these lists are
only meant to supplement a site-specific mailing list or a mailing list
established for a particular proposal.
-
Make use of any established mailing list of persons who should receive
or have requested to receive information on site or program activities.
This will facilitate providing informational materials such as fact sheets,
press releases, and notices to persons who may be interested in a proposed
action. Telephone and facsimile numbers may aid in communicating with organizations
and government entities.
-
Establish a specific mailing list for those interested in a particular
proposed action to facilitate providing information, draft and final documents,
and notices regarding the proposal. Prepare a sign-up sheet at public meetings
and other public forums for individuals who want to be on the mailing list.
Develop the mailing list at the beginning of the public participation process
and maintain it throughout the life of the project.
-
Mailing informational materials is one-way communication, and it is essential
to establish two-way communication through direct feedback from the public
in meetings, telephone conversations, workshops, open houses, etc.
D. Newsletters
Use DES newsletters to publicize plans and upcoming meetings, hearings,
and other activities regarding the proposed program, permit, or action,
provided the publication schedule is consistent with conveying the information
in a timely manner.
E. Fact Sheets
Develop fact sheets regarding the program and any proposed action. These
can be disseminated at public meetings, public libraries, etc.,
and posted on DES’s web page.
F. Press Releases
Use press releases effectively to facilitate communication with the
public.
G. Exhibits
Exhibits include visual displays of maps, charts, diagrams, photographs,
videotapes, computer displays, and models. Their purpose is to illustrate
proposed actions and related issues in a creative and informative way,
making technical information more accessible and understandable. Place
the exhibit where it is most visible to the interested or affected public,
such as a public library or shopping center. Consider displaying a temporary
exhibit at public meetings and other public activities.
H. DES Contacts
-
Designate a point-of-contact for responding to citizens and providing the
public with information on a regular basis.
-
The designated point-of-contact should coordinate all activities with the
DES public information officer.
-
Whenever appropriate, documents should facilitate public access through
the inclusion of staff contacts, toll-free numbers, direct numbers, and
e-mail addresses.
V. Responding to Public Comments
-
Understand that people who comment are expressing sincere concerns.
-
Be timely in responding to public comments.
-
Deal fairly with independent experts. Recognize that people outside of
DES may be highly competent and can contribute valuable perspectives.
-
Provide clear, definite responses to substantive comments. Differentiate
between philosophical and factual differences. Explain why one approach
or option was selected over others.
|
|
Appendix B
Checklist for Designing a Public Participation Process
The following checklist is intended as a guide to assist those responsible
for DES public participation processes in deciding whether or not public
participation is appropriate for a given activity, how such an activity
should be structured, and what process elements should be included:
A. Do you need to involve the public?
1. Describe the situation.
2. Identify potential benefits.
3. Assess the relevance of input.
4. Scan the external aspects.
5. Identify interests and positions.
6. Assess the implications of not soliciting public input at this stage
of the process.
7. Determine statutory requirements or options.
B. Have you laid the groundwork for a well-constructed process?
1. Determine the nature and scope of the decision(s).
2. State the purpose.
3. Estimate the time frame and any time constraints.
4. Identify potential participants.
5. Review possible mechanisms.
6. Estimate resources required.
7. Validate assumptions.
C. Do you have the elements in place to make the process work?
1. Establish goals and limits.
2. Set the schedule.
3. Secure a budget.
4. Approach and engage participants.
5. Select and initiate activities.
6. Confirm and mobilize resources.
7. Establish the ground rules.
8. Evaluate as you go.
D. Did the process work?
1. Determine what to evaluate and how.
2. Explore opportunities for further progress.
3. Apply the lessons learned.
4. Implement and communicate project decisions.
|
|