| Drinking Water and Groundwater Bureau
Environmental
Fact Sheet |
![]() |
| WD-DWGB-3-4 | 2007 |
|
Corrosivity of Water Supplies What is Meant by Corrosivity?
Unfortunately, most surface waters and many groundwaters in New Hampshire are highly corrosive. If you have copper plumbing and notice a bluish-green stain at drip point below leaky sinks and showers, your water likely is highly corrosive. Blue green is the color of copper rust, as orange brown is the color of iron rust. The abbreviation for copper is Cu and the abbreviation for lead is Pb. Lead does not leave a discoloration stain. A water’s corrosiveness can be made worse by the grounding of electrical devices on to the home’s plumbing system. Effects of Corrosive Water
1. Damage to Plumbing – If your water is leaching metals from the plumbing of your home, you should expect that eventual plumbing repair or replacement will be necessary. While all plumbing will be somewhat effected over time by the water its carries, corrosive water will damage plumbing much more rapidly than water with low corrosivity. Pre-flushing the plumbing before taking water for consumption will not lessen this structural damage to the plumbing but will reduce the risk to health associated with ingesting lead and copper. 2. Aesthetic Considerations (taste and appearance) – At higher levels of copper, water will have a metallic taste. There is little or no taste from lead, even when the dissolved lead concentration is high. The presence of elevated copper can also stain clothing and hair. Flushing the plumbing will reduce taste but will not lessen the structural damage that is occurring to metal plumbing. 3. Health Risk – Corrosive water, by itself, is not a health concern; orange juice, vinegar and carbonated soft drinks are all considerably more corrosive than typical New Hampshire well or surface water. What is of concern is that corrosive water can dissolve metals from the plumbing within a home. The consumption of excessive amounts of Lead/copper of these metals from plumbing can present a health risk. Plumbing containing significant concentrations of Lead, may be present in many older homes in New Hampshire. In addition, most of the copper pipe and fittings used in a home's plumbing prior to the mid to late 1980s has lead solder in sweated joints. When corrosive water is present in such piping, and especially when there is no water flow, Lead and copper can accumulate to concentrations that present a health risk to users if stagnant water is regularly consumed. Please see fact sheet ARD-EHP-9 “Copper: Health Information Summary.” Corrosive water can occur at both public and private wells. Public water systems are required to neutralize their water and DES tracks the result to insure effectiveness. Water from metal plumbing systems should be flushed after periods of nonuse. This accumulation of metals is at its worst when the water is sitting stagnant in the plumbing system. This can occur near the end of the periods between 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. associated with normal periods of sleep and during the day between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., if all family members are at school or work. Using stagnant water for direct consumption, or for making a thermos of coffee or diluting frozen juice concentrates, can result in excessive Lead/copper intake. Using Flushing to Avoid Excessive Copper and Lead
There are two methods to determine how long you need to flush the cold water tap: 1. Use the following chart to determine the approximate volume of water to “waste” from a plumbing section to be assured that fresh water has arrived directly from the well or public water main.
2. Flush until after the water has turned cold (cold water indicates the arrival of fresh water from the well or public water main, approximately 1 minute. Surface water may not turn cooler during the summer. Allow further time for lead/copper service lines from the public system to flush. EPA Standard - Action Levels
The term action level means that at least nine samples out of every 10, taken to evaluate corrosivity must have lead/copper concentrations below the respective action level noted above for samples collected in accordance with special sampling protocol including collection during stagnant condition. The action level would be exceeded by having lead/copper concentrations above the respective action levels in more than 10 percent of these stagnant samples. Where lead /copper concentrations exceed the action level, the utility is required to take certain actions, which include study the corrosive nature of the water, take appropriate treatment action and give public notice to system users of the failure to meet the action levels. For a private well serving just one home, meeting the action levels for lead/copper would mean that individual copper and lead test results, taken under appropriate stagnant sampling conditions, should be below the respective action level. Please note, however, that action levels only legally applies to public water systems. Is Your Water Corrosive?
Determining Directly the Copper and Lead Concentrations in Stagnant Samples.
The appropriate number of samples would be based on the number of people served by that public water system. For a private well, one sample is normally taken. For public systems, if any more than 10 percent of these lead/copper samples are above the action level, the water is considered as too corrosive and certain actions are required. Often these actions result in the addition of chemicals to the water to neutralize the water’s corrosivity. Inferring A Water’s Corrosiveness From pH and Alkalinity Data
Within each range, higher alkalinity will result in less corrosive potential. For this discussion, higher alkalinity could be defined as over 35 mg/L as calcium carbonate. Plastic plumbing is common in new housing. Corrosive water will not injure plastic plumbing. Faucet and valves still have metal with some lead present. We suggest stagnant testing for lead to evaluate these fittings. Testing For Corrosivity
If the plumbing is PVC plastic for both the hot and cold water services, there is little to no exposure, other then sources of lead from faucets or well pumps. If there is more than one type of piping in the home, an evaluation should be made to determine what type of piping typically feeds the drinking water faucet be used for the sample and thus what metal contaminants should be tested for. In addition to the home’s plumbing, lead and other metals can also come from a well pump or the connecting piping to your home. Well pumps manufactured after January 1, 1996 generally have little lead. The most logical test procedure is first to test for the “non-flushed” condition. If the first results are high for lead/copper, then retest to confirm, under stagnant conditions, the accuracy of the first results and confirm (with the flushed samples) that the source water is low in lead/copper. Tests for copper, lead and cadmium are $15 each at the DES Laboratory. Thus a single test for lead/copper would be $30. Ways to Reduce the Health Risk
Treatment Methods to Neutralize a Water’s Corrosiveness
Low Technology
For bedrock and point wells and where cost is not a significant factor, purchase water treatment neutralizing tank and fill appropriately with calcite. This is the slightly more expensive option of adding calcite chips to your dug well. Replace lost calcite every three-six months. Advantages include: no moving parts and little repair expectation. Disadvantages include: adds some hardness and gives varying levels of treatment. This is dependent on the water speed thru the calcite bed. Chemical Feed Equipment
The choice of chemical feed equipment should be based on cost and the ability and willingness of the homeowner to maintain the system. For example, a soda ash solution system with a chemical feed pump requires routine inspection and filling of the chemical solution tanks approximately every few weeks. The calcite neutralizing tank requires little or no maintenance other than replacing the calcite chips that have dissolved away once every three-six months. Operating A Corrosion Neutralizing System
Where blue-green staining has been present in the past, the neutralization process will take place in two steps. First, carry out a rough adjustment to reduce the majority of the water's corrosiveness using the appearance of blue-green staining as a guide to the amount of neutralizing chemical needed. Second, fine tune the amount of the chemical addition needed to optimize the neutralization. This fine tuning of the amount of chemical added is done by interpreting laboratory tests of stagnant lead/copper samples. To begin, first clean an area subject to blue-green staining. Rough adjust the chemical feed amount to that recommended by the company selling the device or, if no recommendation is made, select a relatively low amount of chemical at first. For the value chosen, allow a few weeks of operation and determine if the blue-green staining returns. If the staining reoccurs, increase significantly the amount of neutralizing chemicals, clean the stained water use fixtures and observe for a few more weeks. Using the reoccurrence of blue-green staining allows the rough setting of the chemical feed pump rate while avoiding the expense of numerous laboratory tests. Once the blue-green stain abates, or if staining was never a factor, the second part of the effort is to “fine adjust” the amount of chemical added. This requires collection of treated water quality samples for laboratory testing for lead/copper after each smaller increase of the neutralizing chemical. The sample collection would require taking a 1 liter sample taken under stagnant conditions discussed on page 2. Continue to increase chemical feed until both the lead/copper water quality results are below their respective action levels discussed on page 3 or until there is no further improvement. Note the amount of improvement for each unit of addition of chemicals. If the lead/copper levels remain high, you are welcomed to call us for further information. Where Calcite Treatment is Used in the Well
For More Information
Note: This fact sheet is accurate as of October 2007. Statutory or regulatory changes, or the availability of additional information after this date may render this information inaccurate or incomplete. |
||||||||||||||