|
Organics in Drinking Water
TYPES OF ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS
The term "organics" in this document means compounds that have the
element carbon as a principal constituent. Organic compounds can be of
many types and can have many origins. Some organics in drinking water can
be caused by the decay of naturally occurring vegetation. These decay compounds
are called lignins or tannins. The presence of these compounds, dissolved
in water, would be part of the natural environment of that water resource.
A much larger group of organic contaminants are the thousands of manmade
organic chemicals that have been created in the last 50 years. The US EPA
regulates some of these contaminants as health risks in the Safe Drinking
Water Act (SDWA). The upper acceptable concentration of regulated contaminants,
in drinking water, is called the maximum contaminant level (MCL). The MCL
concentrations for the organics regulated by the SDWA are shown on pages
4 and 5.
These manmade organic contaminants can be grouped into subcategories
that are often more recognized (and more easily pronounced) than the more
formal chemical name. These subcategories are given below along with a
few illustrations of specific contaminants in each subcategory.
-
Industrial solvents, such as trichloroethylene, carbon tetrachloride;
-
Hydrocarbons, such as benzene, xylene, toluene;
-
Pesticides, such as aldicarb and chlordane; and
-
Herbicides, such as alachor and silvex.
Trihalomethanes are the byproducts of the chemical reaction between chlorine
and the natural occurring organics in drinking water. These naturally occurring
carbon compounds are not hazardous by themselves, but combined with chlorine
they produce byproduct reactants which have a health concern. Examples
of compounds in the trihalomethanes subcategory include chloroform and
bromoform.
All of these contaminant subcategories, with the exception of trihalomethanes,
are of man-made origin and the result of land use or other human activity
such as: agriculture, manufacturing or improper waste disposal.
ABATEMENT OF CONTAMINATION
Before beginning evaluations as to what treatment techniques will remove
the contaminant(s) of concern, an effort should be first made to identify
and
abate the origin of the contamination. This can minimize the size of the
treatment device and will shortening the period during which treatment
will be necessary. Determining the origin of manmade contaminants, particularly
in bedrock wells, is typically difficult. We suggest contacting our Groundwater
Protection Bureau at 271-3503 for their suggestions and assistance.
TREATMENT OPTIONS
There are generally three treatment methods that have been shown to
be effective in removing organics from drinking water. They are: aeration,
adsorption using activated carbon, and oxidation. Please refer to pages
4 and 5 of this document to determine which method(s) is predicted to give
superior performance for the type of contaminant(s) present in your water.
If the concentration of the contaminants is high, two treatments units
(using different methods) are typically installed. The first unit is used
to remove the "heavy" contaminant load while the second provides a "polishing
step" to assure full removal of the contaminant(s) and to address "breakthough".
This sequential treatment configuration is called a series configuration.
If appropriate for your contaminant, aeration is often the first method
used while activated carbon is often used as the polishing step. See fact
sheet WD-WSEB-2-5 for purchasing and installation
recommendations.
A treatment method(s) should not be purchased until, sufficient water
quality testing has been done to identify all of the following:
-
The short term variability of the contaminants.
-
Whether each contaminant concentration is rising or falling over the long
term.
-
What other contaminants are in the recharge area of your well and how many
are predicted to impact your well in the future.
-
Whether the contaminant is present in a dissolved or pure product form.
If contaminants are present in a pure product state, a recovery method
is also necessary to reduce the size of the treatment system. Please check
with our Groundwater Protection Program at 271-3503 to insure that this
contamination is known to the DES.
Activated Carbon Treatment: Advantages and Disadvantages
Activated carbon has a enormous surface area for the volume it displaces.
One pound has the a surface area of more than a football field. Activated
carbon is a material that attracts many types of organic contaminants onto
its surface. Once the carbon's removal capacity is used up, the carbon
may be returned to the manufacturer for rejuvenation (for very large users)
or can be disposed of appropriately.
If activated carbon is used, the radon and mineral radioactivity concentrations
of the water should also be determined. Activated carbon concentrates radioactivity,
potentially creating a low level radionuclide waste and possible source
of increased radiation within your home. Also activated carbon can foster
the growth of bacteria by concentrating the food the bacteria need to live.
A final concern with activated carbon is the possible release of contaminants
already adsorbed. This possibility is known as "dumping". This could occur
when the carbon is nearly saturated with contaminants and a contaminant
of high preference displaces another with lower preference.
To address exhaustion and dumping, the overall amount of carbon should
be divided into two treatment tanks and the two tanks installed in "series"
such that breakthrough in the first unit can be adsorbed by the newer carbon
in the second unit. The advantage of activated carbon is that the water
does not need to be repressurized and there is less likelihood of bacterial
from contamination by dust and other airborne contaminants.
Aeration: Advantages and Disadvantages
Aeration treatment consists of passing large amounts of air through
the contaminated water. The efficiency of the device is improved by breaking
up the water flow into many small droplets. The goal is to allow the contaminants
to volatilize into the air stream. Aerator configurations include packed
tower and low profile shallow tray styles. Where aeration is used, two
operational problems are possible:
-
Where there are elevated levels of iron or manganese, rusty precipitate
staining of water use fixtures and clothing is possible.
-
Bacterial slime may grow in aerators requiring continuous or periodic chlorination.
The advantage of aeration is that there is no disposal or regeneration
of the treatment system necessary.
Oxidation: Advantages and Disadvantages
Certain organic contaminants will chemically react with oxygen and
oxygen-like compounds. After this treatment, the resultant compounds may
be either fully neutralized or will have a lower level of hazard. Further
treatment may still be necessary. Oxidizing chemicals could include: potassium
permanganate, hydrogen peroxide and hypochlorite. Oxident treatments have
limited applications.
MONITORING PROGRAM AFTER INSTALLATION OF A TREATMENT SYSTEM
Periodic laboratory testing should be done on both the raw and finished
water to determine treatment effectiveness. The frequency of this monitoring
would be determined based on level of health risk posed by the contaminants,
variability and duration of the past sampling record and other site specific
conditions. Where activated carbon is used, the carbon will lose removal
capacity and will need to be replaced at some point. A monitoring program
will be needed to predict the expected longevity of each new recharge of
carbon.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
For further information concerning the layout of a water treatment
system and its purchase, the DES suggests reviewing the Fact Sheet entitled,
"Considerations when Purchasing a Water Treatment System" WD-WSEB-2-5.
We would appreciate your suggestions concerning this fact sheet. In particular,
we are interested in identifying other solutions (or problems) that you
encountered when installing treatment. You are welcome to call the DES's
Water Supply Engineering Bureau at 271-3139 for further information.
For an overall listing of water supply related fact sheets, please request
fact sheet WD-WSEB-15-2. Drinking water fact sheets are available through
the DES web site at: http://www.des.state.nh.us/ws.htm
. Please check the internet annually for updates to this document. 12/02
TREATMENT OPTIONS
| VOC Organic Chemicals |
Maximum Contaminant Level |
Granular Activated Carbon |
Packed Tower Aeration |
Oxidation, Chlorination or Ozonation |
| Benzene |
0.005 mg/L |
c |
a |
|
| Carbon tetrachloride |
0.005 |
c |
a |
|
| 1,2 Dichloroethane |
0.005 |
c |
a |
|
| Trichloroethylene |
0.005 |
c |
a |
|
| Para-dichlorobenzene |
0.075 |
c |
a |
|
| 1,1 Dichloroethylene |
0.007 |
c |
a |
|
| 1,1,1 Trichloroethane |
0.200 |
c |
a |
|
| Vinyl Chloride |
0.002 |
|
a |
|
| cis-1,2 dichloroethylene |
0.07 |
c |
a |
|
| 1,2 Dichloropropane |
0.005 |
c |
a |
|
| Ethylbenezene |
0.7 |
c |
a |
|
| Monochlorobenzene |
0.1 |
c |
a |
|
| o-Dichlorobenzene |
0.6 |
c |
a |
|
| Styrene |
0.1 |
c |
a |
|
| Tetrachloroethylene |
0.005 |
c |
a |
|
| Toluene |
1.0 |
c |
|
|
| trans-1,2 Dichloroethylene |
0.1 |
c |
a |
|
| Xylene (Total) |
10.0 |
c |
a |
|
| Dichloromethane |
0.005 |
|
a |
|
| 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene |
0.07 |
c |
a |
|
| 1,1,2 Trichloroethane |
0.005 |
c |
a |
|
TREATMENT OPTIONS
| Synthetic Organic Chemicals |
Maximum Contaminant Level |
Granular Activated Carbon |
Packed Tower Aeration |
Oxidation, Chlorination or Ozonation |
| Alachlor |
0.002 |
c |
|
|
| Aldicarb |
0.003 |
c |
|
|
| Aldicarb sulfoxide |
0.004 |
c |
|
|
| Aldicarb sulfone |
0.002 |
c |
|
|
| Atrazine |
0.003 |
c |
|
|
| Carbofliran |
0.04 |
c |
|
|
| Chlordane |
0.002 |
c |
|
|
| Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) |
0.0002 |
c |
a |
|
| Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) |
0.00005 |
c |
a |
|
| Heptaehlor |
0.0004 |
c |
|
|
| Heptachlor epoxide |
0.0002 |
c |
|
|
| Lindane |
0.0002 |
c |
|
|
| Methoxchlor |
0.04 |
c |
|
|
| Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) |
0.00005 |
c |
|
|
| Pentachlorophenol |
0.001 |
c |
|
|
| Toxaphene |
0.003 |
c |
a |
|
| 2,4,5-TP (silvex) |
0.05 |
c |
|
|
| 2,4-D |
0.0002 |
c |
|
|
| Dalapon |
0.2 |
c |
|
|
| Di(ethylhexyl)adipate |
0.4 |
c |
a |
|
| Di(ethylhexyl)phthalate |
0.006 |
c |
|
|
| Dinoseb |
0.007 |
c |
|
|
| Diquat |
0.02 |
c |
|
|
| Endothall |
0.1 |
c |
|
|
| Endin |
0.002 |
c |
|
|
| Glyphosate |
0.7 |
|
|
o |
| Hexachlorobenzene |
0.901 |
c |
|
|
| Hexachlorocyclopentadiene |
0.05 |
c |
a |
|
| Oxaml (Vydate) |
0.2 |
c |
|
|
| PAH's |
|
|
|
|
| Benzo(a)pyrene |
0.005 |
c |
|
|
| Benz(a)anthracene |
- |
| Benzo(b)fluoranthene |
- |
| Benzo(k)fluoranthene |
- |
| Chrysene |
- |
| Dibenz(a,h)anthracene |
- |
| Indenopyrene |
- |
| Picloram |
0.5 |
c |
|
|
| Simazine |
0.004 |
c |
|
|
| 2,3,7,8 TCDD Dioxin |
0.0000003 |
c |
|
|
|