|
Ion Exchange Treatment of Drinking Water
INTRODUCTION
Ion exchange (IE) is a water treatment method where one or more undesirable
contaminants are removed from water by exchange with another non-objectionable,
or less objectionable substance. Both the contaminant and the exchanged
substance must be dissolved and have the same type of electrical charge.
One example of IE is the process called "water softening." See fact sheet
3-6 for an explanation of the removal of hardness from drinking water.
ONLY DISSOLVED CONTAMINANTS
When contaminants dissolve in water, they typically form ions.
Ions are electrically charged portions of a compound. There is a balance
of positively and negatively charged ions in natural waters. When contaminants
are dissolved in water, the water is typically crystal clear. If the water
is cloudy or otherwise discolored, it is likely that some, or all, of the
contaminants are in a solid form. Solid particles are not removed by IE
and will clog the treatment media.
The Exchange of Ions
The electrical charge on an ion can be either positive (+) or negative
(-). Valence is the term that describes the category of the electrical
charge on a dissolved ion such as positive 2 or positive 3.
If the contaminant has a positive charge, it would be called a cation,
and would be removed by use of an IE media called a cation exchange
resin. If the contaminant has a negative charge, it would be called
an anion, and the appropriate treatment media would be called an
anion exchange resin.
THE WATER SOFTENING PROCESS
A water softener at a private home typically has two tanks. The taller
tank contains the purifying media called a "cation" exchange resin, while
the smaller tank contains the sodium or potassium salt used to regenerate
the resin media. During normal operations, raw water passes through the
ion exchange resin media in the tall tank. The calcium (Ca++),
magnesium (Mg++),
iron (Fe++), or manganese (Mn++) ions in the
water are typically "exchanged" for sodium (Na+) or potassium
(K+) ions, which have been temporarily stored in the "pores"
of the resin during the previous regeneration cycle. In fact, any contaminant
ion of valence positive 2 or greater will be removed in a water softener.
As the softener removes hardness minerals from the water, sodium or
potassium will be given back proportionally. Shown below is the concentration
of either sodium or potassium that would be added to the existing
raw water concentration, if 10 mg/L of hardness is removed.
Hardness Removed
10 mg/L as CaC03
10 mg/L as CaC03 |
Na+ or K+ Added
Sodium (Na+) added = 4.6 mg/L
Potassium (K+) added = 7.6 mg/L |
CATEGORIZING HARDNESS
Water treatment professionals use different terminology to categorize
hardness in drinking water, as shown below. DES uses the terminology used
by sanitary engineers.
Worded Description
soft water
somewhat hard water
hard water
very hard water |
Sanitary Engineers
0-75 mg/L as CaC03
76 to 150
"
151 to 300 "
301 and up " |
Water Conditioning Industry
0-50 mg/L as CaCO3
51-100
"
101-151
"
151 and up " |
EXPRESSING THE AMOUNT OF HARDNESS IN WATER
There are two terms which are used by drinking water professionals
to identify the concentration of hardness in drinking water. They are:
Milligrams per liter, abbreviated as mg/L.
Grains per gallon, abbreviated as gpg. |
To convert a hardness concentration from one set of units to the other,
use one of the following formula:
-
the concentration in milligrams per liter x 1/17.2
= the concentration in grains per gallon
-
the concentration in grains per gallon x 17.2 = the concentration in milligrams
per liter
One milligram per liter (mg/L) equals 1 part per million (ppm) and 1 mg/L
also equals 1,000 parts per billion (ppb), which can also be expressed
as 1,000 micrograms per liter (ug/L).
Equivalent Concentration as CaCO3
The concentration of hardness in water is normally reported
as a equivalent concentration of calcium carbonate (CaCO3).
This laboratory calculation provides a common reference for the reactive
power of various contaminants regardless of their atomic weight or
valences. Thus, the typical laboratory units used for expressing hardness
are "mg/L as calcium carbonate (CaCO3)".
The equivalent reactive concentrations for various cations are shown below.
Contaminate
10 mg/L Calcium
10 mg/L Magnesium
10 mg/L Iron
10 mg/L Manganese |
Equivalent Weight
= 24.97 mg/L as CaC03
= 41.16 mg/L as CaC03
= 17.92 mg/L as CaC03
= 18.22 mg/L as CaC03 |
REGENERATION
Eventually the removal capacity of the IE resin becomes exhausted and
will need to be regenerated. The regeneration process typically begins
by a rapid backwashing of the resin to remove fine particles that
have been strained out of the water during the production (i.e. service)
portion of the treatment cycle. This rapid backwash provides a physical
cleaning of the outside of the media, but does not regenerate the resin's
IE contaminant removal capability.
The backwash flow rate is then significantly reduced and brine (salt
dissolved in water) is added. The sodium or potassium from the brine permeates
the resin pores and displaces the previously removed contaminants. After
approximately 20 minutes, the remaining brine, along with the concentrated,
displaced contaminant ions are flushed out of the resin tank and disposed
of into an approved dry well, septic tank, or sewer.
REDUCTION OF SALT USAGE
Being a good steward of the environment involves reducing excessive
brine waste wherever possible. Salt brine can contaminate the general groundwater,
and possibly that of your own well. Consequently, reducing salt
usage while maintaining water softener effectiveness, should be an important
goal of all users of water softeners. In areas without sewers, the more
reduction of salt discharge, the less the possibility of contaminating
groundwater.
Four methods can be used to reduce the amount of salt brine used when
regenerating IE resin.
1. Initiation of the Regeneration Cycle
Older water softeners use a time clock to initiate the regeneration
of the resin media. Modern softeners, however, regenerate by either of
the following methods:
-
A probe that measure the water's electrical conductivity.
-
A meter that measures the volume of water already treated during
the production cycle.
In either case, these modern methods of regeneration will be triggered
based on actual exhaustion of the resin, rather than just triggered by
the passage of time. This newer method is called "demand regeneration".
In the historical case, a time clock backwashes a softener whether it needs
regeneration or not, such as during a vacation period. This excessive backwashing
needlessly increases salt use and the generation of waste brine.
When using demand regeneration, the IE device can begin regeneration
at any time of the day even when water is being actively used in the home.
When this happens, the IE device goes into a bypass mode, and untreated
water must be used within the home. This untreated condition, although
a disadvantage of the demand mode, is of short duration. In response to
the bypass of treatment, some manufactures are now producing softeners
with dual media tanks. While one tank is being regenerated the other is
available to produce treated water.
2. Strength of Brine Used to Regenerate
The regeneration of a water softener can be carried out using different
strengths of brine solution. This is achieved by installing the properly
rated venturi siphon insert at the time the system is installed.
From an environmental view point, those IE devices with a higher efficiency
of contaminants removed per pound of salt used, known as weaker brine regeneration,
are the more appropriate to use.
The following summarizes the choice relative to the strength of brine
versus the size of the treatment device:
a. The weak brine regeneration alternative; –
recommended by DES. This method uses approximately 6-7 pounds of salt
to regenerate each cubic foot of IE resin media.
Advantage: Provides a higher efficiency of contaminant removal
per pound of salt. Approximately 7 percent efficiency compared to the 2
percent achieved with the strong brine alternative.
Disadvantage: Results in lower percent regeneration of the
resin, and thus generally requires some enlarging of the size of the softener
if regeneration cycle times are going to be comparable.
b. The strong brine regeneration alternative; - not recommended
by DES. This method uses approximately 12 pounds of salt to regenerate
each cubic foot of softener resin media.
Advantage: Results in higher percentage of regeneration of resin
media, and thus allows the installation of a minimum sized softener.
Disadvantage: Lower efficiency of contaminant removal per pound
of salt.
Approximately 2 percent efficiency compared to the 7 percent achieved
with the weak brine alternative.
3. Capture Last Part of Brine Backwash
This approach recognizes that the level of contaminants present at
the end of the regeneration cycle is much less than at the beginning. Thus,
the last portion of the brine regeneration solution is clean enough to
reuse at the beginning of the next regeneration period. This method is
generally not used at a private home because of the complex controls and
"off line" brine holding required.
4. Partial Treatment (Split Flow)
In this method a portion of the raw water bypasses the treatment process.
This typically requires throttling valves and meters on both the treatment
and the by-pass plumbing lines. A hardness target concentration could be
approximately 50-75 mg/L in the blended treated water. This approach is
not practical where iron or manganese are present in high concentrations.
This process reduces both waste brine and sodium levels in the finished
water.
AVOIDANCE OF SODIUM
Sodium is not regulated as a drinking water health contaminant, and
thus its presence is only of strict importance to those on a doctor mandated
no-salt diet.
If a source of untreated water with low sodium is desired in the home,
untreated water can be provided to an additional faucet located at the
kitchen sink. Sodium can also be avoided by use of potassium chloride to
regenerate the unit.
DISPOSAL OF WASTES TO LEACHFIELD
There is often concern that septic tanks or disposal field will be
harmed by brine waste. Studies by the Water Quality Association (WQA) indicate
that waste brine and purged contaminants do not injure leach fields or
septic tanks. This WQA report is available from DES. If concern remains,
a separate dry well can be constructed on the user's property to dispose
of the brine waste from the regeneration of the softener.
PREFERENCE SEQUENCE
1. Affinity Sequence For Cation and Anion Resins.
IE media have an affinity for certain contaminants over others. The
strength of this selective affinity is governed by two factors:
a. The principal factor affecting the strength of the affinity
is the valence of the contaminant. Thus, aluminum with a plus three
valence will be more strongly held than calcium with a plus two valance.
The higher the valence of the ion, the stronger the affinity of the
media for that contaminant.
b. The second and less strong affinity factor is approximated by
the weight/ size of the contaminant ion. The higher the weight of the
ion, the higher the affinity of the resin for that contaminant.
2. Manmade Modification of Affinity Selectivity
When the target contaminant is not the most preferred compared to another
contaminant(s) in the water, it may be possible to reformulate an IE resin
to better target the specific contaminant of interest. Nitrate selective
resins are an example of such a modified resin. The capacity of these selective
resins for nitrate will not be appreciably diminished by the presence of
sulfate, which normally occurs for the most preferred cation. A down side
to such selective resins is that a higher concentration of salt is needed
to regenerate these resins.
3. Exception to the Affinity Sequence.
The affinity sequence holds for normal commercial grade IE resins at
normal contaminant concentrations. When the contaminant is present at a
much higher concentration, the affinity sequence will be effected, and
the less preferred contaminant at high strength will be exchanged significantly.
Regeneration, using sodium (Na+) or potassium (k+), is the ultimate example
of how a high concentration of a low affinity ion can override natural
selectivity sequence of ions.
4. Dumping
Dumping is a serious limitation of an IE process. Dumping is
related to the affinity sequence and to the relative concentration of the
contaminant in the raw water. To illustrate the importance of dumping,
suppose there are two contaminants that are both initially exchanged in
the treatment process. As treatment continues, the more highly favored
contaminant will be better attracted to the exchange sites of the resin
than the less preferred ions presently there.
As the production cycle continues, this highest preference contaminant
would push off other low affinity contaminants. As a result, the lower
preference contaminant will be dumped and would increase its concentration
in the finished water above the raw water concentration. This concentration
of the less preferred contaminant could exceed a water quality standard
near the end of each production run.
Understanding the dumping phenomenon is critical when operating an IE
system, and choosing which contaminants will govern the setting for the
initiation of the regeneration of the treatment process.
OTHER ION EXCHANGE TOPICS
1. Broad Treatment. IE is a very broad treatment technology,
where numerous other contaminants are removed, as well as the target contaminant.
Thus, beneficial contaminants may be removed and excess treatment, other
than intended, is carried out.
2. Solids Pretreatment. Solids will clog an IE treatment media
preventing efficient exchange of ions. Prefiltration may be needed to remove
solids.
3. Media Age. Every time the IE media is regenerated the resin
is subject to great chemical stress caused by the high concentrated of
brine. This constant compression and expansion weakens and destroys the
IE resin with time. After many years, the resin may need to be replaced.
The resin's remaining capability can be evaluated by having a water treatment
professional determine the whole beed count and the percent of
moisture of the IE media.
4. Loss of Media. If the rate of backwash of the device is too
high, media may be washed out of the tank. This loss of media will reduce
the effectiveness of the treatment. Temperature changes effects backwash
rates. In some fiberglass tanks, the media depth can be identified by shining
a strong light through the tank in an otherwise darkened room, and noting
the shadow that represents the depth of the remaining IE media.
5. Anion Exchange Resin. Earlier in this document, we illustrated
the process for cation exchange. Many other contaminants occur as anion,
such as nitrates (NO3), sulfates (SO4), and arsenic
compounds. To remove multivalent anions, an anion, rather than cation resin
is used. Like the cation resin, the anion resin is regenerated by salt,
although the actual regeneration is by the chloride ion rather than the
sodium ion.
6. Deionization. In its more general form, IE can also be called
deionization. This treatment is a form of IE which typically targets sodium
and chloride and other single valence ions from water. In these cases acids
(H+) and bases (OH -) are typically used as the regeneration chemicals.
Any excess H+ and OH- converts to water. Deionization is used for medical
and industrial situations requiring very pure water. Deionization is not
necessarily for drinking water treatment, and would produce very flat
tasting water. Strong acids and bases are dangerous chemicals to use
in a residential home.
SUMMARY
We suggest that you discuss this brine strength issue and long term
salt savings with your equipment supplier. In general, DES does not recommend
the use of softeners to treat only iron and manganese in non sewered areas
due to brine disposal concerns. Where hardness is above approximately 125-150
mg/l, or where there are multiple contaminants treatable by softening are
present, an IE processes is supported. For detailed information concerning
iron and manganese treatment, see fact sheet WD-WSEB-3-7.
FOR MORE INFORMATION
For further information concerning the layout of a water treatment
system and its purchase, DES suggests reviewing the Fact Sheet entitled,
"Considerations when Purchasing a Water Treatment System" WD-WSEB-2-5.
For more information please call the DES Water Supply Engineering Bureau
at 271-3139. We would appreciate hearing from you concerning improvements
to this fact sheet and your experiences when treating for hardness. For
an overall listing of water supply related fact sheets, please request
fact sheet WD-WSEB-15-2. Drinking water fact
sheets are available through the DES web site at: www.des.state.nh.us/wseb
then select: fact sheets. Please check the internet annually for
any updates. 2/01
|